<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resistance 2 to run at 720p/30fps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/</link>
	<description>Playstation 3 News, PS3 Games, Videos, Cheats, Walkthroughs, Release Dates &#38; Pre-Order Info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Xbot</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-6745</link>
		<dc:creator>Xbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-6745</guid>
		<description>Good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixelsword</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>pixelsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>Monkeynator, you&#039;re missing the points in several ways:

--540p isn&#039;t HD, that was one of my points Halo 3 wasn&#039;t in HD. All because it has a &#039;p&#039; in back of it, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s HD; mostly everyone says 720p looks better than 1080i for a reason.

--1080i may be smoother in some instances, but graphically inferior to 720p; it depends on whether you want smoothness or graphical quality. Now the question remains: given that both Insomniac and Bungie (at the time) were both first party developers, why couldn&#039;t Bungie at least put out 720p graphics on the 360... especially if the 360 is easier to program for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monkeynator, you&#8217;re missing the points in several ways:</p>
<p>&#8211;540p isn&#8217;t HD, that was one of my points Halo 3 wasn&#8217;t in HD. All because it has a &#8216;p&#8217; in back of it, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s HD; mostly everyone says 720p looks better than 1080i for a reason.</p>
<p>&#8211;1080i may be smoother in some instances, but graphically inferior to 720p; it depends on whether you want smoothness or graphical quality. Now the question remains: given that both Insomniac and Bungie (at the time) were both first party developers, why couldn&#8217;t Bungie at least put out 720p graphics on the 360&#8230; especially if the 360 is easier to program for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifewish</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>lifewish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-733</guid>
		<description>this is pretty cool considering past games like Halo 1.3 ran at 200i and Haze ran at 420p..

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is pretty cool considering past games like Halo 1.3 ran at 200i and Haze ran at 420p..</p>
<p> <img src='http://talkplaystation.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resistance 2 (und 1): Neue Infos &#124; PS3 Blog</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Resistance 2 (und 1): Neue Infos &#124; PS3 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-715</guid>
		<description>[...] hier und [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hier und [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkeynator</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkeynator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-714</guid>
		<description>@pixelsword
1080i = 1080i, not 540p

Unless you were saying the data rate is equivalent to 540p @ *60fps*. 1080i runs at 60fps which helps with smoothness and is arguably more than 720p @ 30fps. BTW, 540p is not even a valid HD resolution.

@Andrew
Just because they increased the graphic quality does not mean they did not optimize performance accordingly. They can always improve the graphics quality of the engine, heck they could make it semi-realistic if they wanted to totally kill performance, but they don&#039;t! Secondly the graphic quality can be tuned to the system.

*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pixelsword<br />
1080i = 1080i, not 540p</p>
<p>Unless you were saying the data rate is equivalent to 540p @ *60fps*. 1080i runs at 60fps which helps with smoothness and is arguably more than 720p @ 30fps. BTW, 540p is not even a valid HD resolution.</p>
<p>@Andrew<br />
Just because they increased the graphic quality does not mean they did not optimize performance accordingly. They can always improve the graphics quality of the engine, heck they could make it semi-realistic if they wanted to totally kill performance, but they don&#8217;t! Secondly the graphic quality can be tuned to the system.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixelsword</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>pixelsword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Utalk, the first Gears ran at 1080i, which equals 540p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utalk, the first Gears ran at 1080i, which equals 540p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-710</guid>
		<description>Utalk, you are wrong. It is likely that Gears 2 will run at sub-HD because it uses the Unreal Engine &quot;3.5&quot;, which improves the graphics quality. The first Gears was very good and I think it was pushing the 360 a lot. This one will have improved graphics, and in turn, would probably have lower FPS/lower resolution.

Oh yeah, and don&#039;t tell me that Gears came out a year after launch so it was pushing the 360. The 360&#039;s CPU is basically the same as a standard triple-core CPU. Same architecture and everything. It&#039;s not hard to optimize for it when devs already know to code for PCs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utalk, you are wrong. It is likely that Gears 2 will run at sub-HD because it uses the Unreal Engine &#8220;3.5&#8243;, which improves the graphics quality. The first Gears was very good and I think it was pushing the 360 a lot. This one will have improved graphics, and in turn, would probably have lower FPS/lower resolution.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and don&#8217;t tell me that Gears came out a year after launch so it was pushing the 360. The 360&#8217;s CPU is basically the same as a standard triple-core CPU. Same architecture and everything. It&#8217;s not hard to optimize for it when devs already know to code for PCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UXO22</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>UXO22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-709</guid>
		<description>I take it that they have NOT listened to complaints from the first version that the game needs to also support 1080i.  I hope they didn&#039;t blow these fans off.  If they did, I will NEVER buy another game from this developer.  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it that they have NOT listened to complaints from the first version that the game needs to also support 1080i.  I hope they didn&#8217;t blow these fans off.  If they did, I will NEVER buy another game from this developer.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utalk</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Utalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-708</guid>
		<description>You are right harlem, just like a few game&#039;s for the ps3 including the big one GTA4. The first gears ran at 720p so i don&#039;t think pt 2 will run any lower, Nice try though son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right harlem, just like a few game&#8217;s for the ps3 including the big one GTA4. The first gears ran at 720p so i don&#8217;t think pt 2 will run any lower, Nice try though son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlem's own</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlem's own</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-702</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an onslaught of sub-HD games coming out this generation, one of which will undoubtedly be Gears 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an onslaught of sub-HD games coming out this generation, one of which will undoubtedly be Gears 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://talkplaystation.com/resistance-2-to-run-at-720p-30fps/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=13864#comment-698</guid>
		<description>YES! thanks for this news. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES! thanks for this news. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
